Free Mac Mini
Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Os Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedias AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places dont talk about):
SWFObject degrades gracefully . If flash isnt detected, the flashcontent div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code thats far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesnt even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a noscript content area, but in that case youre limited to only having a replacement img instead of full-blown replacement content.
SWFObject entails terser code . When using SFWObject, youre only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObjects code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in . As it stands, Macromedias implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedias AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedias AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the embed object if thats not ad hoc, I dont know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
This Site Might Help You. RE: This page requires acrunactivecontent.js? This page requires acrunactivecontent.js????? I have been trying to acess a web page and I&39;m getting the message: this page requires acrunactivecontent.js wth is this? Today morning it was working very well and now it&39;s not working, what should I do to fix it WHAT TO DO!!?. Free download page for Project Ragna Ice's ACRunActiveContent.js.Servidor de Ragnarok Online!
Prototype game cheats ps3 . Some caveats:
SWFObject doesnt work if/when javascript is disabled . I personally consider this a small point, but its still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedias approach doesnt suffer this setback given their use of noscript.
EXAMPLE
Anyone familiar with Macromedias suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical: Free Mac Mini
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code: Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Os Every thing was going great, then I upgraded to DW 8.0.2 to fix a FTP issue. Now when I open a page in DW with a f-source flash menu I get a warning that the page contains Object tags that are improper. DW then adds the following code to my page: script src='Scripts/AC_RunActiveContent.js' type='text/javascript'/script
Now the navigation menu is back to default. See http://ops.ntinet.com/template.htm for the page with issues. See http://ops.ntinet.com for a page that displays correct. Please advise..
Chris
Answer:
Chris,
your flash menu code was converted.
The Dreamweaver update 8.0.2 contains Active Content Converter which
is not compatible with our menu.
Disable the active content converter:
http://f-source.com/before_insert/
Replace the code inside of the DIV with original
flash menu code.
Regards
Dmitry
f-source.com
Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Os Why SWFObject is better than AC_RunActiveContent.js for flash embedding
Some advantages of using SWFObject over Macromedias AC_RunActiveContent.js approach (that most places dont talk about):
SWFObject degrades gracefully . If flash isnt detected, the flashcontent div element never gets replaced with the flash object script. This being the case, you can use xhtml compliant code thats far cleaner and more robust than anything Macromedia supports out of the box. Interestingly, Macromedia doesnt even support alternative content when their implementation is called using the jscript. They allow a noscript content area, but in that case youre limited to only having a replacement img instead of full-blown replacement content.
SWFObject entails terser code . When using SFWObject, youre only placing/calling your flash script once instead of multiple times. Notice, for example, that Macromedia requires the flash object to essentially be placed twice, thereby duplicating your work outright. Needless to say, SFWObjects code implementation is far more elegant and much easier to maintain.
SWFObject contains an efficient and robust framework that has extensive functionality built right in . As it stands, Macromedias implementation has no (or at least an extremely cryptic) method for doing things like, for example, passing flash argument variables. In fact, a quick glance at Macromedias AC_RunActiveContent.js file shows that their rendering mechanism is proprietary to the point of absurdity. Case in point, notice Macromedias AC_FL_RunContent() function for generating the embed object if thats not ad hoc, I dont know what is. Dirty, cumbersome, and the perfect example of unnecessary overhead that bars anything from being readily transparent or extensible.
And, of course, all of the regular advantages.
This Site Might Help You. RE: This page requires acrunactivecontent.js? This page requires acrunactivecontent.js????? I have been trying to acess a web page and I&39;m getting the message: this page requires acrunactivecontent.js wth is this? Today morning it was working very well and now it&39;s not working, what should I do to fix it WHAT TO DO!!?. Free download page for Project Ragna Ice's ACRunActiveContent.js.Servidor de Ragnarok Online!
Prototype game cheats ps3 . Some caveats:
SWFObject doesnt work if/when javascript is disabled . I personally consider this a small point, but its still a valid shortcoming. Of course, it seems to me that browsers that are running without javascript enabled are likely to be running without flash enabled, either; this is hardly the sort of crowd that most web applications (relying on flash, nonetheless) have to cater to. Incidentally, Macromedias approach doesnt suffer this setback given their use of noscript.
EXAMPLE
Anyone familiar with Macromedias suggested method for deploying a flash component will find the following typical: Free Mac Mini
Using SWFObject, one can replace the above using about 1/4 the code: Ac_runactivecontent Js Free Mac Os Every thing was going great, then I upgraded to DW 8.0.2 to fix a FTP issue. Now when I open a page in DW with a f-source flash menu I get a warning that the page contains Object tags that are improper. DW then adds the following code to my page: script src='Scripts/AC_RunActiveContent.js' type='text/javascript'/script
Now the navigation menu is back to default. See http://ops.ntinet.com/template.htm for the page with issues. See http://ops.ntinet.com for a page that displays correct. Please advise..
Chris
Answer:
Chris,
your flash menu code was converted.
The Dreamweaver update 8.0.2 contains Active Content Converter which
is not compatible with our menu.
Disable the active content converter:
http://f-source.com/before_insert/
Replace the code inside of the DIV with original
flash menu code.
Regards
Dmitry
f-source.com
